|
|
Post by soadjaeger yankees gm on Oct 22, 2006 22:05:58 GMT -5
NYY
mike pelfrey AA
MIL
tony graffiano ML
i neveer really like pelfrey and didnt think he had much potential and cano getting injured made me realize i had zero backup for my ml infielders and graffiano has decent range and contact
|
|
|
|
Post by Brewers GM on Oct 22, 2006 22:08:50 GMT -5
NYY mike pelfrey AA MIL tony graffiano ML i neveer really like pelfrey and didnt think he had much potential and cano getting injured made me realize i had zero backup for my ml infielders and graffiano has decent range and contact Adding another possible 3-5 starter later on, while dropping more salary, and I'm overloaded at 3rd Graffanino is a free agent after this season so getting something in return for him is nice being that I wasn't going to resign him. |
|
LAA
Full Member
Posts: 103
|
Post by LAA on Oct 22, 2006 22:11:19 GMT -5
IM not on the BOA but if this trade passes it will be a travesty
|
|
|
|
Post by Cincinnatti GM on Oct 22, 2006 22:17:43 GMT -5
IM not on the BOA but if this trade passes it will be a travesty Why don't you mind your own business this is for the BOA to decide not for you to sway there decision! |
|
|
|
Post by dbkgames on Oct 22, 2006 23:07:04 GMT -5
I approve this trade. The injury to Cano obviously creates a need, and Graffanino is actually a decent player. NY is overpaying, but that honestly does not destroy either team, and the overpaying is accepted because of a) the injury to Cano, b) the need of a decent 2B NOW, and c) as previously stated it does not disrupt the balance of the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by TOP GUN - RANGERS on Oct 23, 2006 0:59:46 GMT -5
I'll let it pass. It's NYY's fault that he doesnt show Pelfrey for a better 2B replacement. It's not a devastating type trade that would kill the team so I'm allowing it.
|
|
|
|
Post by youk4mvp- Red Sox on Oct 23, 2006 14:43:58 GMT -5
i agree w/ the other 2 BoA, and am sticking w/ the comments I made in the CIN/DET trade
approved
|
|
