|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 29, 2006 21:49:25 GMT -5
Post by soadjaeger yankees gm on Oct 29, 2006 21:49:25 GMT -5
Oak gives
Bobby keilty
Rich harden
Jason kendall
Nyy gives
Randy johnson
Kelly stinnett
Phillip hughes
Rj is retiring soon and rich harden will live up to his role elimanating the need for hughes. Posoda has been slumping and stinett does not fit in with my lineup so kendall is a good replacement. Keilty is to cover oaklands budget. And the brewers gm is a genius and very manly
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 29, 2006 21:59:30 GMT -5
Post by Brewers GM on Oct 29, 2006 21:59:30 GMT -5
will wait for acceptance before I voice my opinion
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 29, 2006 22:15:53 GMT -5
Post by soadjaeger yankees gm on Oct 29, 2006 22:15:53 GMT -5
Is that good or bad
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 29, 2006 23:21:04 GMT -5
Post by dbkgames on Oct 29, 2006 23:21:04 GMT -5
So let me get this straight, Oakland...you want to give up one of the best pitchers in baseball, a pretty decent catcher, and kielty for not even a full year of RJ, a SP that won't even compare to Harden at his peak (and thats if he reaches that), and nothing more than a backup catcher? terrible trade.
However, I'm not just denying because of that. For the same reason aforementioned by Brewers GM as well, I veto the deal.
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 5:23:34 GMT -5
Post by soadjaeger yankees gm on Oct 30, 2006 5:23:34 GMT -5
this trade puts him undeer budget so he can keep his job
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 10:17:33 GMT -5
Post by dbkgames on Oct 30, 2006 10:17:33 GMT -5
his payroll limit is 70. As long as a deal keeps him over that, I will veto.
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 15:29:33 GMT -5
Post by Twins GM on Oct 30, 2006 15:29:33 GMT -5
Veto.
Yeah.. sweet, Oakland gets under their cap. Usually if you want to get under the cap you don't trade a young superstar for a retiree. This trade sucks.
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 15:59:56 GMT -5
Post by soadjaeger yankees gm on Oct 30, 2006 15:59:56 GMT -5
how can you decide before he gives his reasoning, maybe he has a reason for doing this
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 19:04:53 GMT -5
Post by dbkgames on Oct 30, 2006 19:04:53 GMT -5
because its as simple as: this isn't cutting cap.
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 30, 2006 20:05:34 GMT -5
Post by Brewers GM on Oct 30, 2006 20:05:34 GMT -5
Yeah, the cap he cuts in this deal is only like 500k
|
|
|
|
oak/nyy
Oct 31, 2006 12:15:02 GMT -5
Post by TOP GUN - RANGERS on Oct 31, 2006 12:15:02 GMT -5
how can you decide before he gives his reasoning, maybe he has a reason for doing this Yes, influence of drugs on the mind. Vetoed. |
|
